Brabant Killers: Three Armed Raiders at the Supermarket

Symbols and Traces, My Case Investigation Record 43

Brabant Killer
Three armed gangs appearing in supermarkets

From 1982 to 1985, armed robbers attacked shops and supermarkets in Belgium, killing 28 people and injuring dozens. The violence was far greater than the money stolen.

Figure 1. 1980s Belgian Brabant Road — Image:

From the conclusion of this record to
It is highly likely that about three key armed groups repeated the crime, and at least one person was highly skilled in shooting, vehicle, and police response. The political background theory is not adopted as a conclusion due to the lack of public evidence.

Prologue: Recorded Night

After the night deepens, the data was spread on the desk. The first thing that caught my eye was not the answer, but the imbalance. Some scenes were as clear as photographs and some time zones were empty as a whole. People try to capture one clear scene and explain the whole thing, but I marked the empty section first. Mysteries arise because there are many clues, but they also arise because the distance between clues is too far.

Witnesses described armed personnel of different physiques and roles. Although stolen vehicles, guns, and items recovered from canals continue a long line of incidents, competition among investigative agencies and data management failures have been repeated. The investigation moved between termination and review and could be reopened once new information is available.

I deliberately read the famous hypothesis at the end. First of all, when we encounter the conclusion, it seems that all objects and symbols exist for that conclusion. Therefore, the timetable, place, object, and original text were organized first, and the witness and interpretation were placed in different compartments. The novel-like atmosphere was drawn from the cold texture of the actual record, not from a made-up secret.

Figure 2. Delhaze Supermarkets Attacked — Image:

Case File: What I Could Believe

20313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556

Number	Confirmed Record	Current Reliability
1	The crime of being tied to the Brabant killer was concentrated in 1982, 1983, and 1985.	High
2	It is said that 28 people were killed and more than 40 were injured in the attack.	High
3	The culprits used stolen vehicles and powerful firearms and left in a very short time.	High
4	The 1985 supermarket attack caused excessive killing compared to the amount of deodorization.	Medium
5	Controversy continued over the handling of weapons and objects recovered from the canal and investigation records.	Medium

The members and command structure of the organization, the existence of political purposes, and the true context of the recovery evidence have not been established.

Caution trap
'Unexplained' is not the same as 'supernatural', 'a huge conspiracy', and 'only this hypothesis is possible'. I didn't count the blanks as evidence.

Figure 3. Stolen Saab Vehicles and High Speed Departure — Image:

Scene Reconstruction: Finally, the place of the certain point

was changed to the actual movement, not the stage in your head. We divided the starting point, the last check point, and the location where the item was found and calculated the minimum time required in between. When the dramatic description of later generations was removed, small and specific elements such as sound and lighting, doors and roads, paper and ink, and the spacing of symbols came forward.

The person's mind was not fixed and the action was written first. The same behavior can be caused by fear, planning, error, and fatigue. If it is a code, the same symbol can be a sound, a word, a separator, and a meaningless sign. After writing down all possible roles, he erased the roles that conflict with other records one by one.

Clue 1. The crime of being tied to the Brabant killer was concentrated in 1982, 1983, and 1985.

I split this sentence into three pieces first. It indicated who first checked, how close the confirmation was to the incident, and where the later interpretation was attached. Old events and codes turn into clearer stories than the original while being repeatedly cited. But clarity is not the same thing as accuracy. In my notes, I separated the direct record, the traces left by the object, and the reasoning of later generations into different colors.

Then, the clue was matched with the record that "28 people were killed and more than 40 injured in the attack." It is not a good hypothesis if one hypothesis explains only the first sentence and avoids the second sentence. In particular, attractive explanations also lowered scores if they failed to pass the question, "Does violence greater than the amount of exploitation mean that the purpose itself was fear?" I've seen clues that make the conclusion uncomfortable longer than clues that make the conclusion cool.

If you look at the clues this way, the case seems a little less dramatic. Instead, there is a boundary between how far it is clear and where it is imagined. That boundary is necessary to correct reasoning when new data are released. The most dangerous moment in the unwritten record is not when you make a false hypothesis, but when you turn the hypothesis into a sentence of fact.

Clue 2. It is concluded that 28 people were killed and more than 40 were injured in the attack.

I split this sentence into three pieces first. It indicated who first checked, how close the confirmation was to the incident, and where the later interpretation was attached. Old events and codes turn into clearer stories than the original while being repeatedly cited. But clarity is not the same thing as accuracy. In my notes, I separated the direct record, the traces left by the object, and the reasoning of later generations into different colors.

This clue was then matched with the record, "The criminals used stolen vehicles and powerful guns and left in a very short time." It is not a good hypothesis if one hypothesis explains only the first sentence and avoids the second sentence. In particular, if you fail to pass the question, "What level of training does the vehicle operation and shooting method require?" the attractive explanation also lowered the score. I've seen clues that make the conclusion uncomfortable longer than clues that make the conclusion cool.

If you look at the clues this way, the case seems a little less dramatic. Instead, there is a boundary between how far it is clear and where it is imagined. That boundary is necessary to correct reasoning when new data are released. The most dangerous moment in the unwritten record is not when you make a false hypothesis, but when you turn the hypothesis into a sentence of fact.

Figure 4. Outline of an armed group with shotguns and machine-guns — Image:

Clue 3. Criminals used stolen vehicles and powerful firearms and left in a very short time.

I split this sentence into three pieces first. It indicated who first checked, how close the confirmation was to the incident, and where the later interpretation was attached. Old events and codes turn into clearer stories than the original while being repeatedly cited. But clarity is not the same thing as accuracy. In my notes, I separated the direct record, the traces left by the object, and the reasoning of later generations into different colors.

This clue was then matched with the record that "the 1985 supermarket attack caused excessive killing compared to the amount of theft." It is not a good hypothesis if one hypothesis explains only the first sentence and avoids the second sentence. In particular, if the question "Is the failure of the investigation a systematic cover-up or a cumulative result of institutional segmentation?" failed to pass, the attractive explanation also lowered the score. I've seen clues that make the conclusion uncomfortable longer than clues that make the conclusion cool.

If you look at the clues this way, the case seems a little less dramatic. Instead, there is a boundary between how far it is clear and where it is imagined. That boundary is necessary to correct reasoning when new data are released. The most dangerous moment in the unwritten record is not when you make a false hypothesis, but when you turn the hypothesis into a sentence of fact.

Clue 4. The 1985 supermarket attack caused excessive killing compared to the amount of theft.

I split this sentence into three pieces first. It indicated who first checked, how close the confirmation was to the incident, and where the later interpretation was attached. Old events and codes turn into clearer stories than the original while being repeatedly cited. But clarity is not the same thing as accuracy. In my notes, I separated the direct record, the traces left by the object, and the reasoning of later generations into different colors.

Then, this clue was confronted with the record, "Controversy continued over the handling of weapons and objects recovered from the canal and investigation records." It is not a good hypothesis if one hypothesis explains only the first sentence and avoids the second sentence. In particular, attractive explanations also lowered scores if they failed to pass the question, "Does violence greater than the amount of exploitation mean that the purpose itself was fear?" I've seen clues that make the conclusion uncomfortable longer than clues that make the conclusion cool.

If you look at the clues this way, the case seems a little less dramatic. Instead, there is a boundary between how far it is clear and where it is imagined. That boundary is necessary to correct reasoning when new data are released. The most dangerous moment in the unwritten record is not when you make a false hypothesis, but when you turn the hypothesis into a sentence of fact.

Clue 5. Controversy continued over the handling of weapons and objects and investigation records recovered from the canal.

I split this sentence into three pieces first. It indicated who first checked, how close the confirmation was to the incident, and where the later interpretation was attached. Old events and codes turn into clearer stories than the original while being repeatedly cited. But clarity is not the same thing as accuracy. In my notes, I separated the direct record, the traces left by the object, and the reasoning of later generations into different colors.

This clue was then confronted with the record, "The crime of being tied to the Brabant killer was concentrated in 1982, 1983, and 1985." It is not a good hypothesis if one hypothesis explains only the first sentence and avoids the second sentence. In particular, if you fail to pass the question, "What level of training does the vehicle operation and shooting method require?" the attractive explanation also lowered the score. I've seen clues that make the conclusion uncomfortable longer than clues that make the conclusion cool.

If you look at the clues this way, the case seems a little less dramatic. Instead, there is a boundary between how far it is clear and where it is imagined. That boundary is necessary to correct reasoning when new data are released. The most dangerous moment in the unwritten record is not when you make a false hypothesis, but when you turn the hypothesis into a sentence of fact.

Figure 5. The movement of the crime in the ALST parking lot — Image:

Put three hypotheses on the same scale The

hypothesis was not evaluated as a cool sentence. The number of clues to be explained, the number of newly requested assumptions, and the degree to which they endure the opposite evidence were written, respectively. Even if one clue is fully explained, it is not a good hypothesis if the other records have to be discarded.

Hypothesis A. A professional gang of robbers for the purpose of enjoying violence or fear.

This explanation has the advantage of accepting "the crime of being tied up as a Brabant killer was concentrated in 1982, 1983, and 1985" as a relatively small assumption. I assumed that this hypothesis was correct and walked time and space all over again. Each time people, objects, and symbols moved to the next location, they wrote down the actions and times they needed. There must have been a hidden assumption at the point where the sentence was cut off.

The biggest weakness is that it does not fully explain "the criminals used stolen vehicles and powerful guns and left in a very short time." If you keep adding accomplices, coincidences, and lost things to keep the hypothesis alive, you can explain anything. However, such an explanation does not predict new clues. I only scored when two independent records pointed in the same direction, and I scored every time I called in a new exception.

117100118

So, whether or not to adopt this hypothesis as a conclusion was judged not by atmosphere but by cost. The number of clues to be explained, the number of newly requested households, and the degree to which they endure evidence against them are listed in the same table. Novel scenes were used to show the texture of facts, but not as evidence to fill in the blanks.

119101120

Hypothesis B. A criminal organization, including military police and police training experiences, predicted the investigation response.

121102122

This explanation has the advantage of accepting "28 people are killed and more than 40 injured in the attack" as a relatively small assumption. I assumed that this hypothesis was correct and walked time and space all over again. Each time people, objects, and symbols moved to the next location, they wrote down the actions and times they needed. There must have been a hidden assumption at the point where the sentence was cut off.

123103124

The biggest weakness is that it does not fully explain "the 1985 supermarket attack caused excessive killing compared to the amount of deodorization." If you keep adding accomplices, coincidences, and lost things to keep the hypothesis alive, you can explain anything. However, such an explanation does not predict new clues. I only scored when two independent records pointed in the same direction, and I scored every time I called in a new exception.

125104126

So, whether or not to adopt this hypothesis as a conclusion was judged not by atmosphere but by cost. The number of clues to be explained, the number of newly requested households, and the degree to which they endure evidence against them are listed in the same table. Novel scenes were used to show the texture of facts, but not as evidence to fill in the blanks.

127105128

Hypothesis C. Secret operations aimed at political instability borrowed the form of robbery.

129106130

This explanation has the advantage of accepting "the criminals used stolen vehicles and powerful guns and left in a very short time" as a relatively small assumption. I assumed that this hypothesis was correct and walked time and space all over again. Each time people, objects, and symbols moved to the next location, they wrote down the actions and times they needed. There must have been a hidden assumption at the point where the sentence was cut off.

131107132

The biggest weakness is that it does not fully explain "the controversy surrounding the handling of weapons and objects and investigation records recovered from the canal continued." If you keep adding accomplices, coincidences, and lost things to keep the hypothesis alive, you can explain anything. However, such an explanation does not predict new clues. I only scored when two independent records pointed in the same direction, and I scored every time I called in a new exception.

133108134

So, whether or not to adopt this hypothesis as a conclusion was judged not by atmosphere but by cost. The number of clues to be explained, the number of newly requested households, and the degree to which they endure evidence against them are listed in the same table. Novel scenes were used to show the texture of facts, but not as evidence to fill in the blanks.

Figure 6. Search for physical evidence in the Ronquier Canal — Image:

Conclusions I abandoned

137111138

When I started the investigation, I was also drawn to the most famous explanation. It organized the case into one sentence and gave intention to everything. However, in contrast to the original record, each blank required a new coincidence. I erased the conclusion then and started again. Good reasoning is not about adding anything, but about removing unnecessary assumptions.

139112140

I didn't put 'state conspiracy' and 'simple robbery' on either end. Operational capabilities and failure of investigative agencies are two separate issues. It is likely that the criminals were trained, but that does not mean state command. Excessive violence suggests a purpose other than money, but the exact purpose remains.

141113142

In particular, the details repeated on later articles and the Internet were separated from the source. Just because the same sentence appears in multiple places does not mean that there are multiple independent sources. We first checked the possibility that one error was duplicated. After this process, the case became less colorful, but the weight of the remaining clues increased.

Figure 7. Segmentation of Belgian Police and Military Police Organization — Image:

Anti-evidence: Sentence to destroy my reasoning

145116146

The investigation ends quickly if I gather data that upholds my conclusion. So I put the three most uncomfortable questions next to the conclusion.

147117148

• Does violence greater than the amount of extortion mean that the purpose itself was fear
150119151
• What level of training does vehicle operation and shooting require
152120153
• Is the failure of the investigation a systematic cover-up or a cumulative result of institutional segmentation

155122156

These questions are not decorative. It is a switch that will change its conclusion when new data comes in. The ranking of the hypotheses changes immediately when directly linked information, such as the sighting source, preserved physical evidence, comparative samples from the same author, and independent dating. On the contrary, when the word "likely" increased, the ranking did not change.

Figure 8. Operation Schematic dividing the roles of three — Image:

Final Reasoning: I Reached

159125160

Judgment
It is highly likely that about three key armed groups repeated the crime, and at least one person was highly skilled in shooting, vehicle, and police response. The political background theory is not adopted as a conclusion due to the lack of public evidence.

161126162

This conclusion is not a complete final judgment. The direction calls for the fewest assumptions in the currently disclosed records and explains the most clues at the same time. It is also clear that what comes out changes the conclusion. Reliable original records, verifiable legal science data, and independent evidence directly linking people and objects are needed.

163127164

I do not write that the case is closed. Instead, write down how far you can close it. That boundary is the result of this investigation. The fun of mystery is not that anything is possible. It's about finding out what you can throw away among the possible explanations.

Figure 9. Comparison of deodorant and violence scale — Image:

Additional Survey Record 1. Redraw the timetable

167130168

I re-opened the material on the desk and covered the conclusion this time. The crime of being tied to the Brabant Killer was concentrated in 1982, 1983, and 1985, leaving only "the place and time". Unconfirmed sections were not filled by imagination but marked with blank squares. The larger the square, the lower the reliability of the hypothesis to pass through the section.

169131170

On top of it, I posted an explanation that "a professional robbery group for the purpose of enjoying violence or fear committed the crime." At first, everything seemed right, but a weak connection was revealed when the question "Does violence greater than the amount of exploitation mean that the purpose itself was fear?" was substituted. Hypothesis has to endure the question. If you keep making new coincidences to avoid questions, you will create, not reasoning, from that moment on.

171132172

The results obtained in this section are not confirmed criminals or complete plain texts. Instead, it became clear which explanations required fewer assumptions, and what would flip the ranking if found. Even if the case is not completed, the scope of the investigation can be narrowed. This record is intended to leave that very narrow boundary.

173133174

Further investigation record 2. Disappeared link

175134176

I re-opened the material on the desk and covered the conclusion this time. It is said that 28 people were killed and more than 40 were injured in the attack, leaving only "a line of place and time." Unconfirmed sections were not filled by imagination but marked with blank squares. The larger the square, the lower the reliability of the hypothesis to pass through the section.

177135178

On top of that, I posted an explanation that "a criminal organization, including experienced military police and police training, predicted the investigation response." At first, everything seemed right, but when I substituted the question, "What level of training do vehicle operation and shooting methods require?" a weak connection was revealed. Hypothesis has to endure the question. If you keep making new coincidences to avoid questions, you will create, not reasoning, from that moment on.

179136180

The results obtained in this section are not confirmed criminals or complete plain texts. Instead, it became clear which explanations required fewer assumptions, and what would flip the ranking if found. Even if the case is not completed, the scope of the investigation can be narrowed. This record is intended to leave that very narrow boundary.

181137182

Further investigation record 3. The path of movement of objects

183138184

I re-opened the material on the desk and covered the conclusion this time. The criminals used stolen vehicles and powerful guns and left in a very short time, leaving only one line of place and time. Unconfirmed sections were not filled by imagination but marked with blank squares. The larger the square, the lower the reliability of the hypothesis to pass through the section.

185139186

On top of it, I posted an explanation that "a secret operation aimed at political instability borrowed the form of a robbery." At first, everything seemed right, but a weak connection was revealed when the question was substituted, "Is the investigation failure an organizational cover-up or a cumulative result of institutional segmentation?" Hypothesis has to endure the question. If you keep making new coincidences to avoid questions, you will create, not reasoning, from that moment on.

187140188

The results obtained in this section are not confirmed criminals or complete plain texts. Instead, it became clear which explanations required fewer assumptions, and what would flip the ranking if found. Even if the case is not completed, the scope of the investigation can be narrowed. This record is intended to leave that very narrow boundary.

189141190

Further Survey Record 4. Opposite Hypothesis Night

191142192

I re-opened the material on the desk and covered the conclusion this time. "The 1985 supermarket attack caused excessive killing compared to the amount of deodorization," he continued, leaving only one line of place and time. Unconfirmed sections were not filled by imagination but marked with blank squares. The larger the square, the lower the reliability of the hypothesis to pass through the section.

193143194

On top of it, I posted an explanation that "a professional robbery group for the purpose of enjoying violence or fear committed the crime." At first, everything seemed right, but a weak connection was revealed when the question "Does violence greater than the amount of exploitation mean that the purpose itself was fear?" was substituted. Hypothesis has to endure the question. If you keep making new coincidences to avoid questions, you will create, not reasoning, from that moment on.

195144196

The results obtained in this section are not confirmed criminals or complete plain texts. Instead, it became clear which explanations required fewer assumptions, and what would flip the ranking if found. Even if the case is not completed, the scope of the investigation can be narrowed. This record is intended to leave that very narrow boundary.

197145198

Further Survey Record 5. Distance between record and memory

199146200

I re-opened the material on the desk and covered the conclusion this time. Controversy continued over the handling of weapons and items recovered from the canal and investigation records."The place and the time were lined up, leaving only one behind. Unconfirmed sections were not filled by imagination but marked with blank squares. The larger the square, the lower the reliability of the hypothesis to pass through the section.

201147202

On top of that, I posted an explanation that "a criminal organization, including experienced military police and police training, predicted the investigation response." At first, everything seemed right, but when I substituted the question, "What level of training do vehicle operation and shooting methods require?" a weak connection was revealed. Hypothesis has to endure the question. If you keep making new coincidences to avoid questions, you will create, not reasoning, from that moment on.

203148204

The results obtained in this section are not confirmed criminals or complete plain texts. Instead, it became clear which explanations required fewer assumptions, and what would flip the ranking if found. Even if the case is not completed, the scope of the investigation can be narrowed. This record is intended to leave that very narrow boundary.

Figure 10. 1982·1983·1985 crime map — Image:

Records and references

· Belgian Police — Brabant Killers investigation

208152209

· Belgian Science Policy — organised crime report

210153211

· Belga News Agency — investigation status

212154213

※ This article is a commentary in the form of personal survey records based on public records and reliable data. I have distinguished between confirmed facts and my reasoning, and I update my judgment when a new official announcement is made. External material images were edited for some color and composition according to the permitted licensing conditions, and each image source was shown in the caption.